Identification of Freshwater Zooplankton Functional Groups Based on the Functional Traits of Species
https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2020-3-290-306
Abstract
Information on the functional traits of the most widespread species of freshwater zooplankton (Rotifera, Cladocera, and Copepoda) in European Russia was collected and analyzed. Our database includes 355 species described by 4 traits, namely: maximum body length, trophic group, feeding type, and movement type. Cluster analysis based on Gower's functional distances shows that freshwater zooplankton can be classified into 19 groups with different ecological roles. The characteristics of each identified functional group are presented. We believe it to be fundamentally important to build a unified classification using all available data and applicable characters for all three main taxonomic groups of zooplankton. Comparison with the existing ecological zooplankton classification proposed by Yu. S. Chuikov has demonstrated a number of advantages of our approach. Several ecological groups in Yu. S. Chuikov’s classification are represented by more fractional categories in our classification. Our system of functional groups can be used in studies of the structure of zooplanktocoenoses based on direct cluster analysis and ordination or based on functional distances between samples. To calculate the functional similarity between species, one can use our database of features, which is contained in the Appendix. Analysis based on functional groups gives a better unerstanding of the structure of a community than traditional ordination, which takes into account only the taxonomic affiliation of species. The approach used for functional group identification can be useful in assessing functional diversity and identifying patterns of freshwater zooplanktocoenoses dynamics. The database of functional signs of zooplankton can be used to check the relationship of functional signs with environmental factors.
About the Authors
D. E. GavrilkoRussian Federation
23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhni Novgorod 603950
G. V. Shurganova
Russian Federation
23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhni Novgorod 603950
I. A. Kudrin
Russian Federation
23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhni Novgorod 603950
B. N. Yakimov
Russian Federation
23 Gagarin Avenue, Nizhni Novgorod 603950
References
1. Borutsky E. V., Stepanova L.A., Kos M. S. Opredelitel Calanoida presnih vod SSSR [Key to Calanoida Freshwater the USSR]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1991. 504 p. (in Russian).
2. Zlobin Yu. A. The Main Trends in the Development of Ecological and Functional Classifications of Plants. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2012, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1470–1472 (in Russian).
3. Korovchinsky N. M. Coniferous Crustaceans of the order Ctenopoda of the World Fauna (Morphology, Systematics, Ecology, Zoogeography). Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2004. 410 p. (in Russian).
4. Kotov A. A. Morphology and Phylogeny Anomopoda (Crustacea: Cladocera). Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2013. 638 p. (in Russian).
5. Krylov A. V. Zooplankton ravninnyh malyh rek [Zooplankton of Lowland Small Rivers]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2005. 263 p. (in Russian).
6. Kutikova L. A. Kolovratki fauny SSSR [Rotifers of the USSR Fauna]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1970. 744 p. (in Russian).
7. Kutikova L. A. Bdelloidnye kolovratki fauny Rossia [Bdelloid Rotifers of the Fauna of Russia]. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2005. 315 p. (in Russian).
8. Mirkin B. M., Naumova L. G. Sovremennoe sostoyanie osnovnyh kontseptsiy nauki o rastitelnosti [Current State of Basic Concepts in Vegetation Science]. Ufa, Gilem Publ., 2012. 488 p. (in Russian).
9. Monakov A. V. Pitanie i pishchevye predpochtenia presnovodnyh kopepod [Diet and Food Preferences of Freshwater Copepods]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1976. 170 p. (in Russian).
10. Monakov A. V. Pitanie presnovodnyh bespozvonochnyh [Eating Freshwater Invertebrates]. Moscow, Rossel'khozakademiia Publ., 1998. 322 p. (in Russian).
11. Onipchenko V. G. Funktsionalnaya fitotsenologia [Functional phytocenology]. Moscow, Krasand Publ., 2014. 640 p. (in Russian).
12. Key to Zooplankton and Zoobenthos in Freshwater in European Russia. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2010. 495 p. (in Russian).
13. Pesenko Yu. A. Printsipy i metody kolichestvennogo analiza v faunisticheskih issledovaniyah [Principles and Methods of Quantitative Analysis in Faunistic Research.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 288 p. (in Russian).
14. Ramenskiy L. G. On the Fundamental Principles, Basic Concepts and Terms of Industrial Typology of Lands, Geobotany and Ecology. Sovetskaia botanika, 1935, no. 4, pp. 25–42 (in Russian).
15. Romanovskiy Yu. E. Current State of the Life Cycle Strategy Concept. Nauchnye doklady vysshei shkoly. Biologicheskie nauki, 1989, no. 11, pp. 18–31 (in Russian).
16. Rylov V. M. Rakoobraznye. Cyclopoida presnyh vod [Crustaceans. Cyclopoida Freshwater]. Fauna of the USSR. Moscow, Leningrad, Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1948, vol. 3, iss. 3. 162 p. (in Russian).
17. Serebryakov I. G. Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rasteniy: Zhiznennyye formy pokrytosemennyh i khvoynyh [Ecological Morphology of Plants: Life Forms of Angiosperms and Conifers]. Moscow, Vysshaia shkola Publ., 1962. 378 p. (in Russian).
18. Smirnov N. N. Crustaceans. Chydoridae Fauna of the World. Fauna of the USSR. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1971, vol. 1, iss. 2. 553 p. (in Russian).
19. Smirnov N. N. Crustaceans. Macrotricidae and Moinidae Fauna of the World. Fauna of the USSR. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1976, vol. 1, iss. 3. 237 p. (in Russian).
20. Stoiko T. G., Mazey Yu. A., Senkevich V. A. Planktonnye kolovratki Penzenskih vodoyemov [Plankton Rotifers of the Penza Water Bodies]. Penza, Izdatel'stvo Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016. 166 p. (in Russian).
21. Sushchenya L. M. Kolichestvennye zakonomernosti pitaniya rakoobraznyh [Quantitative Regularities of Crustacean Nutrition]. Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika Publ., 1975. 208 p. (in Russian).
22. Chuikov Yu. S. Ecological Analysis of the Composition and Structure of Aquatic Animal Communities as a Method for Biological Assessment of Water Quality. Russian J. of Ecology, 1978, no. 5, pp. 53–57 (in Russian).
23. Chuikov Yu. S. Analysis of the Trophic Structure of the Plankton Community. In: Osnovy izucheniia presnovodnykh ekosistem [Foundations of the Study of Freshwater Ecosystems]. Leningrad, Zoologicheskii institut AN SSSR Publ., 1981, pp. 45–52 (in Russian).
24. Chuikov Yu. S. Materialy k kadastru planktonnyh bespozvonochnyh basseyna Volgi i Severnogo Kaspiya. Kolovratki (Rotatoria) [Materials for the Inventory of Planktonic Invertebrates in the Volga and North Caspian Basin. Rotifers (Rotatoria)]. Togliatti, Institut ekologii Volzhskogo basseina RAN Publ., 2000. 195 p. (in Russian).
25. Yakimov B. N., Shurganova G. V., Cherepennikov V. V., Kudrin I. A., Il’in Mu. Y. Methods for Comparative Assessment of the Results of Cluster Analysis of Hydrobiocenoses Structure (by the Example of Zooplankton Communities of the Linda River, Nizhny Novgorod Region). Inland Water Biology, 2016, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 200–208.
26. Barton A. D., Pershing A. J., Litchman E., Record N. R., Edwards K. F., Finkel Z. V., Kiørboe T., Ward B. A. The Biogeography of Marine Plankton Traits. Ecology Letters, 2013, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 522–534.
27. Benedetti F., Gasparini S., Ayata S. Identifying Copepod Functional Groups from Species Functional Traits. J. Plankton Research, 2016, vol. 38, iss. 1, pp. 159–166.
28. Bledzki, l., Rybak J. Freshwater Crustacean Zooplankton of Europe Cladocera & Copepoda (Calanoida, Cyclopoida). Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, 2016. 918 p.
29. Díaz S., Cabido M. Vive la Différence: Plant Functional Diversity Matters to Ecosystem Processes. Trends Ecology Evolution, 2001, vol. 16, iss. 11, pp. 646 – 655.
30. Geber M. A., Griffen L. R. Inheritance and Natural Selection on Functional Traits. International J. of Plant Science, 2003, vol. 164, pp. 21–42.
31. Grime J. P. Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory. The American Naturalist, 1977, vol. 111, pp. 1169–1194.
32. Gower J. C. A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties. Biometrics, 1971, vol. 27, iss. 4. pp. 857–871.
33. Korovchinsky N. M. Cladocera: Ctenopoda. Families Sididae, Holopediidae & Pseudopenilidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera). Identification Guides to the Plankton and Benthos of Inland Waters. Weikersheim, Backhuys Publ. 2018. 208 p.
34. Kotov A., Stifter P. Cladocera: Family Ilyocryptidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda). Identification Guides to the Plankton and Benthos of Inland Waters. Weikersheim, Backhuys Publ., 2006. 177 p.
35. Kotov A., Bekker E. Cladocera: Family Eurycercidae (Branchiopoda: Cladocera: Anomopoda). Identification Guides to the Plankton and Benthos of Inland Waters. Weikersheim, Backhuys Publ., 2016. 97 p.
36. Legendre P., Legendre L. Numerical Ecology. Oxford, Elsevier, 2012. 990 p.
37. Litchman E., Ohman M. D., Kiorboe T. Trait-based Approaches to Zooplankton Communities. J. of Plankton Research, 2013, vol. 35, pp. 473–484.
38. Obertegger U., Smith H. A., Flaim G., Wallace R. L. Using the Guild Ratio to Characterize Pelagic Rotifer Communities. Hydrobiologia, 2011, vol. 662, pp. 157–162.
39. Padisàk J., Crossetti L., Naselli-Flores L. Use and Misuse in the Application of the Phytoplankton Functional Classification: A Critical Review With Updates. Hydrobiologia, 2009, vol. 621, pp. 1–19.
40. Pavoine S., Ricotta C. Functional and Phylogenetic Similarity Among Communities. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014, vol. 5, iss. 7, pp. 666–675.
41. Pomerleau C., Sastri A. R., Beisner B. E. Evaluation of Functional Trait Diversity for Marine Zooplankton Communities in the Northeast Subarctic Pacific Ocean. J. Plankton Research, 2015, vol. 37, pp. 712–726.
42. Raunkiær Ch. Plant Life Forms / transl. from Danish by H. Gilbert-Carter. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1937. 104 p.
43. Reynolds C. S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L., Melo S. Towards a Functional Classification of the Freshwater Phytoplankton. J. Plankton Research, 2002, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 417–428.
44. Rousseeuw P. J. Silhouettes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis. J. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 1987, vol. 20, pp. 53–65.
45. Symstad A. J., Siemann E., Haarstad J. An Experimental Test of the Effect of Plant Functional Group Diversity on Arthropod Diversity. Oikos, 2000, vol. 89, iss. 2, pp. 243–253.
46. Tilman D., Knops J., Wedin D., Reich P., Ritchie M., Siemann E. The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes. Science, 1997, vol. 277, pp. 1300– 1302.
47. Violle C., Navas M., Vile D., Kazakou E., Fortunel C., Hummel I., Garnier E. Let the Concept of Trait be Functional! Oikos, 2007, vol. 116, iss. 5, pp. 882–892.
48. Vogt R. J., Peres-Neto P. R., Beisner B. Using Functional Traits to Investigate the Determinants of Crustacean Zooplankton Community Structure. Oikos, 2013, vol. 122, iss. 12, pp. 1700–1709.
49. Walker B. H. Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy. Conservation Biology, 1991, vol. 8, pp. 18–23.
Supplementary files
![]() |
1. Database of Functional Parameters of Freshwater Zooplankton | |
Subject | ||
Type | Research Instrument | |
Download
(215KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Gavrilko D.E., Shurganova G.V., Kudrin I.A., Yakimov B.N. Identification of Freshwater Zooplankton Functional Groups Based on the Functional Traits of Species. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology. 2020;(3):290-306. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2020-3-290-306