Peculiarities of the population structure in the settlement of secret toad-headed agama, Phrynocephalus mystaceus (Pallas, 1776) (Lacertilia: Agamidae) on the Sarykum sandy massif
https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2025-1-108-118
Abstract
The article present the research results of the secret toad-headed agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus mystaceus Pallas, 1776) population structure on the Sarykum sandy massif (N 43°00'23.9", E 47°14'04.3"). The purpose of the study was to clarify features of the lizard population structure in the conditions of an island habitat: an isolated sandy area. The species' settlement in Sarykum featured a very high population density, averaging 82.1 ind./ha, a relatively small average size of individual home ranges and their significant overlap within sexual groups, namely: on average 69.7±33.32% for males, 50.7±35.92% for females and 57.5±39.41% between the home ranges of females with males, respectively. The overlap of home ranges within the group of young animals was significantly greater, 93.2±12.9%. Another peculiarity of the settlement was the predominance of immature individuals in the sedentary part (1.7:1), whose 1-2-day sites moved around the territory of the settlement. The latter is probably connected with the desire of the young to gain a foothold in any part of the overpopulated territory. A flow of migrants equal to 25.7 ind./ha per week passed through the settlement territory, consisting in equal parts of sexually mature and immature animals. An incomplete overlap of the territories of females with those of males could be considered as a possible element of the abundance autoregulation mechanisms, which reduces the number of meetings of sexual partners. All specific features of the settlement are apparently connected with the island position of the population.
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out within the framework of the Strategic Academic Leadership Program of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba.
About the Authors
G. V. Polynova
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina V. Polynova, Institute of Ecology
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
O. E. Polynova
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga E. Polynova
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
D. O. Kapralova
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria O. Kapralova
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow 117198
References
1. Ananjeva N. B., Mazanaeva K. F. The secret toadheaded agama Phrynocephalus mystaceus Pallas, 1776 (populations of the Pre-Caucasus). In: Red Data Book of Russian Federation. Animals. 2nd edition. Moscow, VNII Ecology Publ., 2021, pp. 439–440 (in Russian).
2. Bastille-Rousseau G., Potts J. R., Schaefer J. A., Lewis M. A., Ellington E. H., Rayl N. D., Mahoney S. P., Murray D. L. Unveiling trade-offs in resource selection of migratory caribou using a mechanistic movement model of availability. Ecography, 2015, vol. 38, iss. 10, pp. 1049–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01305
3. Brushko Z. K. Lizards of Kazakhstan Deserts. Almaty, Konjik, 1995. 232 p. (in Russian).
4. Brushko Z. K. Territorial distribution of the long-eared murrelet in the conditions of an isolated barchan. Izvestiya AN KazSSR. Biological Series, 1980, vol. 35, pp. 21–24 (in Russian).
5. Cherlin V., Okshtein I., Alieva S., Magomedova A. Estimation of the number of the toadheaded agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus) and the stepperunner (Eremias arguta) on the Sarykum dunes and their surroundings (Dagestan Republic, Russian Federation). Principles of the Ecology, 2022, no. 4, pp. 98‒114 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15393/j1.art.2022.13122
6. Flint V. E. Prostranstvennaya struktura populyatsii melkikh mlekopitayushchikh [Spatial Structure of Small Mammal Populations]. Moscow, Nauka, 1977. 181 p. (in Russian).
7. Khonyakina Z. P. Materials on reproduction and molting of the toad-headed agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus Pall.) in Dagestan. Scientific Notes of Dagestan University. Biology Sciences, 1961, vol. 7, pt. 2, pp. 105–133 (in Russian).
8. Khonyakina Z. P. Populations of the Toad-headed agama in Dagestan. In: Gerpetologiya. Otv. red. Ya. Kh. Turakulov [Turakulov Ya. Kh., ed. Herpetology]. Tashkent, Nauka Uzbek SSR, 1965, pp. 40–42 (in Russian).
9. Khonyakina Z. P. Life span and population dynamics of Toad-headed agama in Dagestan. Voprosy fiziologii, biokhimii, zoologii i parazitologii [Problems of Physiology, Biochemistry, Zoology and Parasitology]. Makhachkala, Dagknigoizdat, 1967, iss. 2, pp. 94–96 (in Russian).
10. Krasnaya kniga Astrakhanskoi oblasti [Red Book of the Astrakhan Region]. Astrakhan, Astrakhan State University Publ., 2014. 413 p. (in Russian).
11. Krasnaya kniga Chechenskoi Respubliki. Redkie i nakhodiashchiesia pod ugrozoi ischeznoveniia vidy rastenii i zhivotnykh [Red Book of the Chechen Republic. Rare and Endangered Species of Plants and Animals]. Grozny, Yuzhnyi izdatel'skii dom, 2007. 432 p. (in Russian).
12. Krasnaya kniga Stavropol'skogo kraya: Redkie i nakhodiashchiesia pod ugrozoi ischeznoveniia vidy rastenii i zhivotnykh. T. 2. Zhivotnye. Otv. red. S. I. Sigida [Sigida S. I., ed. Red Book of Stavropol Krai: Rare and Endangered Species of Plants and Animals. Vol. 2. Animals]. Stavropol, Poligrafservis, 2002. 216 p. (in Russian).
13. Lotiev K. Yu., Batkhiev A. M. Degradation of the Turan herpetofaunal complex in the Terek sand massif (Eastern Ciscaucasia). University Proceedings. Volga Region. Natural Sciences, 2019, no. 2 (26), pp. 115–128 (in Russian).
14. Macey R. J., Schulte J. A. II, Ananjeva N. B., van Dyke E. T., Wang Y., Orlov N., Shafei S., Robinson M. D., Dujsebayeva T., Freund G. S., Fischer C. M., Liu D., Papenfuss T. J. A molecular phylogenetic hypothesis for the Asian agamid lizard genus Phrynocephalus reveals discrete biogeographic clades implicated by plate tectonics. Zootaxa, 2018, vol. 4467, no. 1, pp. 1–81. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4467.1.1
15. Mazanaeva L. F. Secret toad-headed agama. In: Krasnaya kniga Respubliki Dagestan [Red Data Book of the Republic of Dagestan]. Mahachkala, Dzhamaludinov M. A., 2020, pp. 521–523 (in Russian).
16. Moorcroft P. R., Lewis M. A. Mechanistic Home Range Analysis. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2006. 192 p.
17. Moorter B. V., Visscher D., Benhamou S., Börger L., Boyce M. S., Gaillard J.-M. Memory keeps you at home: A mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos, 2009, vol. 118, iss. 5, pp. 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17003.x
18. Naumov N. P. Ekologiya zhivotnykh [Ecology of Animals]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1963. 618 p. (in Russian). Paraskiv K. P. Presmykayushchiyesya Kazakhstana [Reptiles of Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata, Izdatel'stvo AN Kazakhskoi SSR, 1956. 228 p. (in Russian).
19. Perry G., Garland T. Jr. Lizard home ranges revised: Effects of sex, body size, diet, habitat, and phylogeny. Ecology, 2002, vol. 83, iss. 7, pp. 1870–1885.
20. Pianka E. Evolutionary Ecology. Moscow, Mir, 1981. 400 p. Pianka E. R., Parker W. S. Ecology of horned lizards: A review with special reference to Phrynosoma platyrhinos. Copeia, 1975, no. 1, pp. 141–162.
21. Polynova G. V. Demonstration behavior of the Secret toad-headed agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus). Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1982, vol. 61, iss. 5, pp. 450–461 (in Russian).
22. Polynova G. V. Spatial-ethological Structure of Some Desert Lizard Species. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Biol.). Moscow, 1988. 234 p. (in Russian).
23. Polynova G. V., Lobachev V. S. Territorial relations of the toad-headed agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus). Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1981, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1649–1657 (in Russian).
24. Polynova G. V., Polynova O. E. On the extinction of the intra-population group of the lizard Phrynocephalus mystaceus mystaceus (Pallas, 1776) in the overgrown semi-deserts of the Astrakhan region. Principles of the Ecology, 2021, no. 1, pp. 43–51 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15393/j1.art.2021.10442
25. Polynova G. V., Polynova O. E. Specific features of the size structure of marginal populations of the nominative subspecies of the secret toad-headed agama (Phrynocephalus mystaceus mystaceus) (Agamidae, Reptilia). Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology, 2024, no. 1, pp. 52–63 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2024-1-52-63
26. Polynova G. V., Mishustin S. S., Polynova O. E. Spatial structure of the spotted toad agama (Phrynocephalus guttatus guttatus, Agamidae) population in the conditions of overgrowth of semideserts in the Astrakhan region. Principles of the Ecology, 2022, no. 1, pp. 92–110 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15393/j1.art.2022.12202
27. Ricklefs R. E. The Economy of Nature. Moscow, Mir, 1979. 424 p. (in Russian). Rose B. Lizard home range: Methodology and functions. Journal of Herpetology, 1982, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 253–269.
28. Sarayev F. A., Pestov M. V. To the cadastre of reptiles of the Northern and Northeast Caspian sea. In: Gerpetologicheskiye issledovaniya v Kazakhstane i sopredel'nykh stranakh. Pod red. T. N. Dujsebayevoy [Dujsebayeva T. N., ed. Herpetological Studies in Kazakhstan and Neighboring Countries]. Alamaty, Association for the Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan, 2010, pp. 174– 193 (in Russian).
29. Semenov D. V. Individual areas of some species of desert lizards. In: The Problems of Herpetology: Abstracts of Fourth Herpetological Conference. Leningrad, Nauka, 1977, pp. 191–192 (in Russian).
30. Semenov D. V. The comparative aspects of spatial ecology of lizards exemplified by the toad-headed lizards (Reptilia, Agamidae, Phrynocephalus). Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii, 2007, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 379–393 (in Russian).
31. Semenov D. V., Shenbrot G. I. Evaluation of lizards’ absolute population density in view of the edge effect. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1985, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1246–1253 (in Russian).
32. Shilov I. A. Ekologo-fiziologicheskie osnovy populyatsionnykh otnoshenii u zhivotnykh [Ecological and Physiological Bases of Population Relations in Animals]. Moscow, Moscow State University Press, 1977. 261 p. (in Russian).
33. Solovyeva E. N., Dunayev E. A., Nazarov R. A., Radjabizadeh M., Poyarkov N. A. Molecular and morphological differentiation of Secret Toad-headed agama, Phrynocephalus mystaceus, with the description of a new subspecies from Iran (Reptilia, Agamidae). ZooKeys, 2018, iss. 748, pp. 97–129. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.748.20507
34. Tabachishin V. G., Zavialov E. V., Tabachishina I. E. Spatial distribution of Eremias arguta (Pallas, 1773) in North of its Volga habitat. Current Studies in Herpetology, 2006, vol. 5-6, pp. 117– 124 (in Russian).
35. Tertyshnikov M. F. Presmykaiushchiesia Tsentral'nogo Predkavkaz'ia [Reptiles of the Central Pre-Caucasian Region]. Stavropol, Stavropolservisshkola, 2002. 239 p. (in Russian).
36. Waldshmidt S. R. The effect of the statistically based models on home size estimate in Uta stansburiana. The American Midland Naturalist, 1979, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 236–240.
Review
For citations:
Polynova G.V., Polynova O.E., Kapralova D.O. Peculiarities of the population structure in the settlement of secret toad-headed agama, Phrynocephalus mystaceus (Pallas, 1776) (Lacertilia: Agamidae) on the Sarykum sandy massif. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology. 2025;(1):108-118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2025-1-108-118
Views:
1104
Email this article 
