Dynamics of the composition and structure of phytoplankton communities in the Velikaya River in the period from 2016 to 2021
https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2024-4-431-441
Abstract
Freshwater phytoplankton is sensitive to environmental changes; therefore its monitoring is a crucial aspect of ecological, recreational and economic importance. Examination of the multi-year alterations in phytoplankton populations is of paramount importance, as it enables to elucidate the underlying drivers of the change and to formulate projections for future scenarios. The present work studies the dynamics of the dominant species of summer phytoplankton in the Velikaya River delta from 2016 to 2021, including the relationship between the species composition and the quantitative characteristics of phytoplankton with changes in pH and water temperature. In general, there was a tendency of decreasing the species diversity and the quantity of phytoplankton in the delta of the Velikaya River during the study period. In 2020 and 2021, there was a sharp decline in the number/biomass of the phytoplankton species that usually dominated in the river. These changes first affected green microalgae and cyanobacteria (2020), and then diatoms (2021). During the same period (2020–2021), the largest decrease in cell numbers was observed in the cyanobacterium Aphanocapsa delicatissima, which allows us to use this species as an indicator of the status of the phytoplankton in the Velikaya River delta. Water temperature and pH significantly influenced the numbers of cells of the dominant phyla (Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, and Cyanobacteria) and correlated weakly with the species composition. In particular, water temperature and pH influenced the numbers of cyanobacterial cells, indicating the importance of these factors in the initiation of blooms in water bodies and suggesting that the effect is enhanced by their simultaneous action.
About the Authors
Tatiana V. DrozdenkoRussian Federation
2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000
Alena A. Volgusheva
Russian Federation
bldg. 1/12, Vorobyovi Gory, Moscow 119991
Taras К. Antal
Russian Federation
2 Lenin Square, Pskov 180000
References
1. Barinova S. S., Medvedeva L. A., Anisimova O. V. Biodiversity of Algae-indicators of the Environment. Tel Aviv, Pilies Studio Publ., 2006. 498 p. (in Russian).
2. Beaufort L., Probert I., de Garidel-Thoron T., Bendif E. M., Ruiz-Pino D., Metzl N., Goyet C., Buchet N., Coupel P., Grelaud M., Rost B., Rickaby R. E., de Vargas C. Sensitivity of coccolithophores to carbonate chemistry and ocean acidification. Nature, 2011, vol. 476, pp. 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10295
3. Castellani C. Plankton: A Guide to their ecology and monitoring for water quality. Journal of Plankton Research, 2010, vol. 32, iss. 2, pp. 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbp102
4. Díaz S., Cabido M. Vive la différence: Plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2
5. Dixit S. S., Smol J. P., John C., Kingston D. F. Diatoms: Powerful indicators of environmental change. Environmental Science & Technology, 1992, vol. 26, iss. 1, pp. 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00025a002
6. Drozdenko T. V., Antal T. K. Evaluating water quality in Velikaya River by using phytoplankton characteristics. Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Fishing Industry, 2021, no. 1, pp. 51–60 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24143/2073-5529-2021-1-51-60
7. Drozdenko T. V., Volgusheva A. A. Phytoplankton and water quality of Lake Kuchane (Pskov region, Russia). Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology, 2021, no. 3, pp. 251–261 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2021-3-251-261
8. Drozdenko T. V., Kek I. V., Mishkova T. A. Phytoplankton as a bioindicator of the water quality of lake Malenets (Pskov region). Samara Journal of Science, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 58–61 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17816/snv202093110
9. Elliott J. A. Is the future blue-green? A review of the current model predictions of how climate change could affect pelagic freshwater cyanobacteria. Water Research, 2012, vol. 46, iss. 5, pp. 1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.018
10. Finkel Z. V., Katz M. E., Wright J. D., Schofield O. M. E., Falkowski P. G. Climatically driven macroevolutionary patterns in the size of marine diatoms over the Cenozoic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2005, vol. 102, iss. 25, pp. 8927–8932. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409907102
11. Hennon G. M. M., Hernández L. M. D., Haley S. T., Juhl A. R., Dyhrman S. T. Diverse CO2induced responses in physiology and gene expression among eukaryotic phytoplankton. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017, vol. 8, article no. 2547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02547
12. Ighalo J. O., Dulta K., Kurniawan S. B., Omoarukhe F. O., Ewuzie U., Eshiemogie S. O., Ojo A. U., Abdullah S. R. S. Progress in microalgae application for CO2 sequestration. Cleaner Chemical Engineering, 2022, vol. 3, iss. 8, article no. 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2022.100044
13. Lebedeva O. A. Ecosystem of the Velikaya river delta and its impact on the Pskov-Chudskoe Lake. Pskov Journal of Regional Studies, 2006, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 107–121 (in Russian).
14. Locke A., Sprules W. G. Effects of acidic pH and phytoplankton on survival and condition of Bosmina longirostris and Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia, 2000, vol. 437, pp. 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026563109217
15. Nagelkerken I., Connell S. D. Global alteration of ocean ecosystem functioning due to increasing human CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2015, vol. 112, iss. 43, pp. 13272–13277. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510856112
16. Peterson H. G., Healey F. P., Wagemann R. Metal toxicity to algae: A highly pH dependent phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1984, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 974– 979. https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-11
17. Raven J. A., Giordano M., Beardall J., Maberly S. C. Algal and aquatic plant carbon concentrating mechanisms in relation to environmental change. Photosynthesis Research, 2011, vol. 109, iss. 1–3, pp. 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-011-9632-6
18. Regaudie-de-Gioux A., Duarte C. M. Temperature dependence of planktonic metabolism in the ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2012, vol. 26, iss. 1, article no. GB1015. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GB003907
19. Sadchikov A. P. Methods of Studying Freshwater Phytoplankton: Methodological Guide. Moscow, Universitet i shkola, 2003. 157 p. (in Russian).
20. Wu Y., Campbell D. A., Irwin A. J., Suggett D. J., Finkel Z. V. Ocean acidification enhances the growth rate of larger diatoms. Limnology and Oceanography, 2014, vol. 59, iss. 3, pp. 1027–1034. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.3.1027
21. Yang Xe., Wu X., Hao Hl., He Z. L. Mechanisms and assessment of water eutrophication. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 2008, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0710626
Review
For citations:
Drozdenko T.V., Volgusheva A.A., Antal T.К. Dynamics of the composition and structure of phytoplankton communities in the Velikaya River in the period from 2016 to 2021. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology. 2024;(4):431-441. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2024-4-431-441