Peculiarities and results of transport noise monitoring with the example of the Samara region of Russia
https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2021-4-436-446
Abstract
Problems of transport noise monitoring are considered. Existing approaches to transport noise monitoring have a number of disadvantages. The influence of the noise from transport and other sources on the public health was estimated. The results show a reliable, statistically significant dependence of the population illness growth on acoustical pollution. A new system of transport noise monitoring is suggested and approved in conditions of the Samara region of Russia. This system has a number of advantages for acoustic research. The acoustic characteristics of separate vehicles and their spectral values were investigated as well. Analysis of our measurement results of the transport noise from cars of different kinds shows that the most significant noise values are observed within a low frequency range. Thus, when reducing transport noise down to appropriate hygienic values, special attention should be paid to reduction of the low-frequency component of noise.
Supporting agencies: The study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (agreement No. 20-19-00222).
About the Author
A. V. Vasilyev
Samara State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Vasilyev - Povolzhslky Resources Center of Engineering Ecology and of Chemical Technology, Samara State Technical University.
244 Molodogvardeyskaya St., Samara 443100.
References
1. Vasilyev A. V. Reducing the noise of traffic flows in a modern city. Ecology and Industry of Russia, 2004, no. 6, pp. 37–41 (in Russian).
2. Carrese S., Cipriani E., Mannini L., Nigro M. Dynamic demand estimation and prediction for trafic urban networks adopting new data sources. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, vol. 81, pp. 83–98.
3. Chukarin A. N., Fedenko A. A., Shashurin A. E., Vasilyeva V. K. Regression analysis of the coefficients of vibration energy losses in gas-discharge systems of power plants. Akustika, 2021, vol. 41, pp. 115–118. https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika202141115
4. Kerner B. S., Demir C., Herrtwich R. G., Klenov S. L., Rehborn H., Aleksi M., Haug A. Traflc state detection with floating car data in road networks. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2005, pp. 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2005.1520133
5. Lo Castro F., Iarossi S., De Luca M., Vasilyev A. V. Infrasound monitoring technologies. Akustika, 2021, vol. 39, pp. 237–241. https://doi.org/10.36336/akustika202139235
6. Melloni A., Pecchioni G., Bellomini R., Luzzi S. Noise mapping and planning in the city of Florence. Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Sound and Vibration: From Ancient to Modern Acoustics, ICSV 2016. Athens, Greece, 2016, pp. 1528–1533.
7. Santiago J. S., Pons J. New acoustic map of Madrid. Proceedings of “Inter-Noise 2000” International Congress. Nice, France, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 3573–3576.
8. Vasilyev A. V. New methods and approaches to acoustic monitoring and noise mapping of urban territories and experience of it approbation in conditions of Samara region of Russia. Procedia Engineering, 2017, vol. 176, pp. 669–674.
9. Vasilyev A. V. Russian experience of transport noise estimation and mapping. Akustika, 2019, vol. 32, pp. 105–109.
10. Vasiliev A. V. Recent approaches to environmental noise monitoring and estimation of its influence to the health of inhabitants. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV14). Cairns, Australia, 2007, pp. 3242–3249.
Review
For citations:
Vasilyev A.V. Peculiarities and results of transport noise monitoring with the example of the Samara region of Russia. Povolzhskiy Journal of Ecology. 2021;(4):436-446. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35885/1684-7318-2021-4-436-446
Views:
304
Email this article 
