Population Approach to Determination of the Borders and Number of Natural Plague Foci

Population approach to determination of the borders and number of natural plague foci implies the specialists’ acceptance of the concept that the existence of a natural plague focus is always provided by a single population of the main carrier. Motivation for our discussion of such an approach was the data of a long-term study of the Hissar natural plague focus (Tadzhikistan). The area of the focus was only 300 km2 and its functioning was maintained by a single, relatively small population of Microtus carruthersi (Thomas, 1909) – the main carrier of plague. The Hissar mountain range territories adjacent to the focus have been surveyed for plague for more than 20 years, however, no plague agent (Yersinia pestis Lehmann, Neuman 1986) has been found, despite the complete identity of the species composition of rodents and fleas. Many of the known natural plague foci are significantly larger in size than the Hissar focus and inhabited by several populations of the main carrier. For instance, in the East-Caucasian high-mountain focus, covering the area of 23,500 km2 , five groups of common vole populations (the main carrier of plague) are distinguished (Microtus arvalis Pallas, 1778). In the Tuva mountain focus, the plague agent was detected in six populations of the main carrier – the long-tailed souslik (Spermophilus undulates Pallas, 1778). In the territory of the Mojynkumsky desert natural plague focus that occupies 93,000 km2 , 17 populations of the great gerbil (Rhombomus opimus Lichtenstein, 1823) were singled out. Similar data are available for a number of other foci. Revealingly, in different populations of the main carriers, genotype differences were identified, both in rodents and the plague agent, as well as asynchrony in the plague epizooty development. Thus, the plague parasitic coenosis, operating within the boundaries and in the territory of a single population of the main carrier, constitutes an autonomous, standalone natural focus. Therefore, the foci with several populations of the main carrier are, in fact, groups of autonomous foci with a close, similar biocoenotic structure. There are many more natural (autonomous) foci within the natural plague focality zone than is widely assumed.

population, natural focus, plague, plague carrier, voles, souslik, pikas

1. Balakhonov S. V., Shestopalov M. Yu., Romanova I. F. Results of the VNTR-analysis in a Locus (5'-NAAA-3')n of Strains Yersinia pestis from the Active Natural Foci of Plague of Siberia. Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Virology, 2009, no. 3, pp. 14–17 (in Russian).

2. Balakhonov S. V., Korzun V. M., Chipanin E. B., Afanas’ev M. V., Mikhailov E. P., Denisov A. V., Fomina L. A., Eshelkin I. I., Mashkovsky I. K., Mishchenko A. I., Rozhdestvensky E. N., Yarygina M. B. Gorno-Altaiskii prirodnyi ochag chumy: Retrospektivnyi analiz, epizootologicheskii monitoring, sovremennoe sostoianie. Pod red. S. V. Balakhonova, V. M. Korzuna [GornoAltai natural plague focus: retrospective analysis, epizootiological monitoring, current state]. S. V. Balakhonov, V. M. Korzun, eds. Novosibirsk, Nauka-Tsentr Publ., 2014. 272 p. (in Russian).

3. Beklemishev V. N. Agents of diseases as members of biocenoses. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1956, vol. 35, iss. 12, pp. 1755–1779 (in Russian).

4. Bibikov D. I. Surki i chuma v gorax Centraljnoy Azii [Marmots and Plague in Central Asia Mountains]. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Biol.). Alma-Ata, 1965. 35 p. (in Russian).

5. Bryukhanov A. F., Eremenko E. D., Bryukhanova G. D., Grizhebovsky G. M., Zharinova N. V., Tsareva N. S., Mezentseva O. N. Genotyping of plague microbe strains by variable number tandem repeats. Quarantine and Zoonotic Infections in Kazakhstan, 2001, iss. 3, pp. 72–75 (in Russian).

6. Verzhutsky D. B. Activity dynamics of natural focality areas of Tuva natural plague focus. Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 2003, no. 3, pp. 36–39 (in Russian).

7. Verzhutsky D. B. Prostranstvennaia organizatsiia naseleniia khoziaina i ego ektoparazitov: teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty (na primere dlinnokhvostogo suslika i ego blokh) [Spatial organization of host population and host ectoparasites: theoretical and applied aspects (by the example of the long-tailed souslik and its fleas)]. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Biol.). Irkutsk, 2005. 46 p. (in Russian).

8. Grigor’ev M. P. Analiz populiatsionnoi struktury nositelei v Tsentral'no-Kavkazskom prirodnom ochage chumy [Analysis of the carrier population structure in central-Caucasian natural plague focus]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Biol.). Stavropol, 1998. 23 p. (in Russian).

9. Dubrovsky Yu. A., Kucheruk V. V. Spatial structure of Central Asiatic-Kazakhstan part of great gerbil areal (Rhombomys opimus). Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1971, vol. 50, iss. 2, pp. 259–273 (in Russian).

10. Dyatlov A. I., Kazakov V. P. Population structure of common vole settlements in HighMountain Dagestan. In: Osobo opasnye infektsii na Kavkaze: tezisy dokladov [Particularly Dangerous Infections in Caucasus: highlights of the report]. Stavropol, Nauchno-issledovatel'skii protivochumnyi institut Kavkaza i Zakavkaz'ia Ministerstva zdravookhraneniia SSSR Publ., 1987, pp. 297–299 (in Russian).

11. Dyatlov A. I., Petrov P. A., Golubev P. D., Trufanov G. V. Concerning the structure of the small souslik (Citellus pygmaeus Pall.,1778) areal in the vicinity of the Mount Elbrus. Russian J. of Ecology, 1980, no. 5, pp. 77–83 (in Russian).

12. Dyatlov A. I., Antonenko A. D., Grizhebovsky G. M., Labunets N. F. Prirodnaia ochagovost' chumy na Kavkaze [Natural plague focality in Caucasus]. Stavropol, Protivochumnyi institut Publ., 2001. 347 p. (in Russian).

13. Kadastr epidemicheskikh i epizooticheskikh proiavlenii chumy na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii i stran blizhnego zarubezh'ia (s 1876 po 2016 god). Pod red. V. V. Kutyreva, A. Iu. Popovoi [V. V. Kutyrev, A.Yu. Popova, eds. Cadastre of epidemic and epizootic plague manifestations in the territory of the Russian federation and former Soviet Union states (between 1876 and 2016)]. Saratov, Amirit Publ., 2016. 248 p. (in Russian).

14. Kazakov V. P. Prirodnaia ochagovost' chumy v vysokogor'iakh Vostochnogo Kavkaza [Natural plague focality in high-mountain areas of East Caucasus]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Biol.). Saratov, 1989. 23 p. (in Russian).

15. Kasenova A. K., Sabilaev A. S., Davydova V. N., Sapozhnikov V. I., Larionov G. I., Kosilov V. A. Some peculiarities of plague epizooties in the left bank areas of the river Ili. Quarantine and Zoonotic Infections in Kazakhstan, 2004, no. 1, pp. 44–47 (in Russian).

16. Korenberg E. I. Natural focality of infections: modern issues and research prospects]. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 2010, vol. 89, iss. 1, pp. 5–13 (in Russian).

17. Korenberg E. I., Pomelova V. G., Osin N. S. Infections With Natural Focality Transmitted by Ixodid Ticks. A. L. Gintsburg, V. N. Zlobin, eds. Moscow, Nauchno-issledovatel'skii institut biologicheskogo priborostroeniia Publ., 2013. 463 p. (in Russian).

18. Korzun V. M., Balakhonov S. V., Chipanin E. V., Denisov A. V., Mikhailov E. P., Mishchenko A. I., Yarygina M. B., Rozhdestvensky E. N., Fomina L. A. Formation, evolution, and functioning of natural plague focus in Altai Mountains. Medical Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 2016, no. 1, pp. 17–25 (in Russian).

19. Kucheruk V. V. Structure, typology, and zoning of natural foci of human diseases. In: Itogi razvitiia ucheniia o prirodnoi ochagovosti boleznei cheloveka i dal'neishie zadachi [Results of doctrine development on the natural focality of human diseases and further implications]. Moscow, Meditsina Publ., 1972, pp. 180–212 (in Russian).

20. Logachev A. I., Korzun V. M., Mikhailov E. P., Rozhdestvensky E. N., Balakhonov S. V. Dissemination of tryptophan-dependent variants of Yersinia pestis in the territory of Altai mountain natural plague focus. Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections, 2012, iss. 3, pp. 20–25 (in Russian).

21. Popkov A. F., Chipanin E. V., Korzun V. M. Population phenetic differentiation of Mongolian pika in South-Eastern Altai. Baikal Zoological J., 2012, no. 1, pp. 114–117 (in Russian).

22. Rapoport L. P., Kovtun I. P., Karpov A. A., Maleev A. N., Vetrov F. E., Balabas N. G. On the matter of population structure of great gerbil areal in Muyunkums. Ekologiia i meditsinskoe znachenie peschanok fauny SSSR [Ecology and Medical Purpose of pikas of USSR fauna]. Moscow, Institut epidemiologii i mikrobiologii im. N. F. Gamalei AMN SSSR Publ., 1977, pp. 86–87 (in Russian).

23. Rapoport L. P., Rakhimov K. R., Putyatin V. V., Balabas N. G., Orlova L. M., Kovtun I. P., Kondratenko L. P., Mochalova E. P. Concerning asynchrony of plague epizooties in different areas of Mojynkum. Quarantine and Zoonotic Infections in Kazakhstan, 2002, iss. 5, pp. 83–87 (in Russian).

24. Sludsky A. A., Derlyatko K. I., Golovko E. N., Ageev V. S. Gissarskii prirodnyi ochag chumy [Hissar natural plague focus]. Saratov, Izdatel'stvo Saratovskogo universiteta, 2003. 248 p. (in Russian).

25. Truphanov G. V., Golubev P. D. On population structure of the mountain souslik Citellus musicus in Central Caucasus. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1982, vol. 61, iss.1, pp. 96–101 (in Russian).

26. Fenyuk B. K. Geography issues of natural plague foci. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 1958, vol. 37, iss. 7, pp. 961–971 (in Russian).